Programmatic, native and other social media DOHs
by Stan Faryna
Pharrel Williams, Happy
27 February 2014
Pharrel Williams, Happy
1 Comment | Advertising and Marketing, Blogosphere and Internet, Interactive Advertising Bureau, Online Strategy (biz and politics), Technology and Developers | Tagged: advertising, Love, marketing, native, programmatic, social media, truth | Permalink
Posted by Stan Faryna
This week. Like a overflowing cup, this week runs over with strong feelings and pounding hearts.
Imogen Heap, Just For Now
Sorrow and tears were shared. But also kindness and at least one smile. Or two. And prose – if it is not poetry – made certain demand upon me.
Please visit the awesome bloggers (Jayme Soulati and Kaarina Dillabough) who are kind and generous to allow me to guest post and share words of hope and happy.
And the prose?
Bear with me. This too shall pass. Quickly.
I stretched out my hand to poetry
this early morning
and I felt the distance grow between words
Were those miles there before I had begun?
Like glass shattering, the shards scattering
across the kitchen floor; like a people
from a more perfect union – but they say
Lincoln’s a poet and poetry mends
hearts, ways, hopes, families, neighborhoods and peoples.
That would be progress!
Or prosperous by any other name.
Technology, commerce, innovation –
cannot tow a star-faring ship of state
up a creek like a stubborn juggernaut.
Yes, star-faring ship –
that is what I wrote!
The seas are sailed
and the seas run red.
The shining cities
are not soon enough
nor the Orion
starports blinking in their ochre glory.
At dock, hum the engines of Enterprise,
ready to carry our hopes even further.
Beyond poetry. Fiction. And Boston.
19 April 2013
Recent blog posts:
Click and buy the mug shown below and help feed kids.
Have you ever thought about how people are more comfortable rejecting proposals than advocating, refining, and supporting a proposal in hand?
But if every solution that is proposed is found to be flawed in one aspect or another, none shall be adopted and executed upon. Actually, don’t most people stop thinking about solving the problem once the proposal is defeated?
The defeat of a proposal, however, is neither a milestone nor an accomplishment. That’s not a step forward.
Yet people will treat the proposal as the problem – and once the proposal is defeated, they feel like they’ve solved a problem and it’s back to business – the business of sustainable failure.
Sounds like gridlock, doesn’t it? But it happens all the time. I do it. You do it. We all do it. Again and again.
How do we get beyond sustainable failure?
That’s a question for you and me to think about. Right now. I’d like to know your thoughts on this. The comment section is below.
02 October 2012
4 Comments | Blogosphere and Internet, Leadership and Management, Social Web, Technology and Developers | Tagged: gridlock, problem, proposals, social media DOHS, sustainable failure | Permalink
Posted by Stan Faryna
T H E H E R O S C H O O L R E V I E W I S S U E NO. 5
Edited by Stan Faryna
Beauty School Drop Out from the Motion Picture, Grease
7 Comments | Blogosphere and Internet, Games, Social Web, Technology and Developers | Tagged: Agent of Chaos, Disney, Hallford, Halliford, Magik, Marvel Avengers Alliance, Phoenic Pinion, Phoenix Flare, Playdom, The Hero School Review | Permalink
Posted by Stan Faryna
Jack Steiner has a blog post about why it’s important to consistently write and publish blog posts.
Among the topics Jack discusses therein… is his indecision about what is the best comment system he should be using on his blog. He’s using CommentLuv at the moment and I am in favor of it for several reasons – even if I can’t use it because this is a WordPress.com blog.
Among the things I had to say to him about this in my comment there, I suggested that he write blog posts about what is right and wrong about CommentLuv and his ideas about how CommentLuv could be better.
I mention Jack and my comment to Jack because this blog post is yet another exercise in me doing just that – unlocking potential, taking it out of the box, giving feedback, building community consensus for change, and, quite possibly, inserting foot into mouth.
The only other thing that I have to emphasize before I get into my epic proposal for changes in the game play of the Marvel Avengers Alliance…
Intelligent proposals have a structure and that structures looks something like this (more or less):
2. Problem to be solved or advantage to be captured
3. Outline of solution
4. Potential contentions considered
6. Call to Action
I haven’t listed these elements of a Proposal for Jack’s sake – in case that mistaken thought crossed your mind. Jack knows his shit. He is an effective writer.
But some of my fellow gamers tend to think that an effective proposal or counter argument should be a sprawling paragraph or two of attitude. They, however, will not succeed in life, business, leadership, and world-changing endeavors – if they keep on un-thinking like that. [grin]
My proposal for Hero Level 13 and Beyond began here:
However, it’s obvious to me that not enough players have access to that forum. Also forum posts get buried.
This proposal reflects on how players of Marvel Avengers Alliance (FB or Playdom.com) can advance heroes beyond level 12 because of the following reasons:
1. After all that effort and attention to leveling up a hero, Level 12 heroes tend become flight deck staff
2. There is little to no fun leveling up various “impotent” heroes or heroes that don’t personally excite me – and agent level ups alone, obviously, do not appeal to the majority of players.
There could have been 100’s of players at agent level 250 or higher on Playdom.com at this point of time, but we don’t see that happening. And there’s a reason for that. Alone, that kind of achievement just doesn’t excite most people. Myself, included.
I am not saying that the high level agent achievement is foolish or unworthy of respect!
3. The excitement, enthusiasm and story for a hero can not grow further – a bummer for the fan of a hero
4. PVP is monkey mindless-ness and, ultimately, disengaging at a certain high ranking: same top heroes fighting the same top heroes with (mostly) predictable and un-novel results
5. Playdom wants to add additional revenue streams but they need to do so in a way that does not un-balance the game
6. Playdom wants to retain more players for a longer period of engagement
7. Playdom wants to develop a game sustainability strategy that makes it number one in the social game industry
Hot Marvel Groupie: Remind me – what the hell is the point of the Danger Room?
Hawkeye: We build our strength, speed, stamina, agility and other things, baby.
[Hot groupie lights a cigarette and rolls out of bed – her long legs catch Hawkeye’s eye – again]
Hot Marvel Groupie: I think you need to put more time in the Danger Room, Mr. Flight Deck Manager.
[Hawkeye does a facepalm]
Heroes will level beyond 12, but there shall be no Gold-paid hero level speed ups after level 12. Every 3rd hero level, a hero trains in the disciplines. Training is initiated if the necessary experience is had (just like before) and at a fixed cost of say 500,000 silver (or 100 Gold) for each discipline training event.
In other words, discipline training would occur at the following hero levels: 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34
That is not Agent levels! I’m talking about Hero levels – in case you confused the two.
Discipline training does not prevent Playdom from adding additional Hero skills for training. And I hope that they would begin to add more skills by the Christmas commercial season (that starts the day after Thanksgiving – hint hint).
When a hero training session is completed, you have a roulette situation of 9 possible results. Permanent Stat increase “rewards” will look like this:
1. 300 Health
2. 300 Stamina
3. 50 Attack*
4. 50 Accuracy*
5. 50 Defense*
6. 50 Evasion*
7. 60 (Random Stat*)
8. 65 (Random Stat*)
9. 70 (Random Stat*)
The disciplines will create considerable variation among the same heroes of different players. Thus PVE and PVP game play will be more novel and less predictable. Such enhancement of heroes may also allow Playdom to develop more challenge and surprise in PVE within the context of future chapters and spec ops.
One more thing.
Omega Level Mutants will be able to roulette twice per discipline training event for an additional cost of 500,000 Silver (or 100 Gold). According to the Marvel storyline, Omega Level Mutants include Phoenix and Storm. I would elevate another two unlikely, problematic heroes to the Omega storyline. NightCrawler and Luke Cage, for example.
How dare we make new Omega Level Mutants without Stan Lee’s blessing?! Because our game should and must contribute and fuel the Marvel storyline. The direction of the Marvel storyline shouldn’t be so one-sided.
I’ve gotten some interesting and intelligent feedback on this solution. And I hope to get a lot more. Feel free to leave comments on this blog post!
PVP will get a lot harder because some will level their heroes up and have higher stats.
As long as players can not pay for speed-up leveling, everyone has the same opportunity to level up their heroes and increase hero stats.
PVP has all sorts of problems, but as long as you aren’t matched to an opponent five (or more) levels above you, whatever their stat enhancements, such enhancements are not going to be grounds for a totally unfair fight.
Even though the business model is to sell Gold – paying players cannot have tremendous advantages at every vector – otherwise free players will be less interested and engaged in the 100+ side of the game and, ultimately, the community will dissolve.
Oh – fights are never fair. Especially in real life. [grin]
Random Variation of Enhanced Heroes is counter-intuitive to the player’s desire to develop the hero’s stats in accordance with their vision of the hero
Players would ultimately develop heroes in a popular manner based upon published formulas (as they do with ISO-8 socketing) and thus put us all back into the same situation of a lack of variation and novelty
Player vision (regarding hero development) can be supplemented by several means as illustrated below.
(1) Adding 8 additional ISO-Sockets – each socket comes with a fixed fee to use. Perhaps, 500,000 silver.
(2) Adding 8 tech sockets to the uniforms – we can talk about this later
(3) Player-choice between two or three skills per “skill addition level-up” as they level beyond 12
If you are a control freak and you want a free lunch, you ain’t ever going to be happy. Just like in real life. [grin]
Variety is the spice of life.
People will only develop a few heroes (because of time and effort) and we’re back to the same problem of a lack of variety and un-novel results in terms of the same named heroes appearing in PVP.
Yes and No.
Yes, the top heroes will be developed and have the same unprecedented representation in PVP. But they won’t all be the same because their stat enhancements were random results.
No, because we all have seen that there are some very passionate hero-fans that are so devoted to their heroes that they are going to throw themselves at making their hero relevant. Wolverine, Spiderman, etc. I’m willing to bet they put the most effort into developing their heroes in their bid to dominate the PVP scene.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see an uber Hawkeye – because someone is on a mission from GOD to show us all that we are mistaken about Hawkeye’s impotence. [grin]
It’s too much work to level up heroes to a hero level 34.
You are free to play as you like. With as much or as little effort as you like. Just because it’s hard work and you don’t want to commit to that – doesn’t mean that it won’t make this a better experience for everyone else.
Part of the recipe for making a better world is supporting others, their vision and creativity – even when it doesn’t benefit you specifically and in an immediate and obvious manner.
Uplift others. This is the meaning of leadership. Not interested in being a leader and doing leaderly things? Then STFU and follow! [smile]
The game is good as is (for me). When I’m bored, I’ll go find play another game. There is no need for me (or you) to think about how to make anything better.
The designers and programmers at Playdom need to produce value every fucking hour. They have to eat, pay rent, and acquire material verisimilitudes of happiness too, right?
If the design and programming teams aren’t making this game more engaging to new and existing players, making the most of Disney’s investment, and building new revenue streams through this game, then they can go home and – just like big daddy said…
“… hang, beg, starve, die in the street…”
– Romeo and Juliet, Act 3 Scene 5
Sorry, I get carried away when I imagine that people don’t have a fucking clue about why they get a paycheck.
Random Stat Allotment is unpredictable and may result in disappointingly useless stat enhancements or overwhelmingly awesome stat enhancements.
Few rewards of human activity represent equal results and satisfaction. There’s a song by the Rolling Stones that explains it better than I could.
But if you try sometimes, you just might find you get you need.
In other words, opportunity is novel, interesting, and relevant. Results – they should be what they be.
Rolling Stones, You can’t always get what you want
If you like my proposal, you can act on one, two, three, four or all four calls to action:
1. You can go to this link and type, I Agree or whatever you say when you agree with something.
2. You can go to this link and type, I Agree or whatever you say when you agree with something.
3. Make a comment on this blog post and give it a five star rating
4. File a ticketed support request (category: suggestions) with this little message in the description:
I want hero level 13 and beyond!
For more info, read it here:
Stan Faryna (aka kobodaishi)
Editor of The Hero School Review – 30,000 readers strong
Omega Guild Facebook Group
4 Comments | Blogosphere and Internet, Games, Social Web, Technology and Developers, Upfront and Personal | Tagged: Hawkeye, Hero Level, Luke Cage, Marvel Avengers Alliance, Night Crawler, Omega Level Mutants, Phoenix, Spirit of the Disciplines, Storm | Permalink
Posted by Stan Faryna
Jefferson Airplane, White Rabbit
This is so awesome that it defies any attempt to describe it with any of my usual coherence, clarity and objectivity – not in one sentence.
It costs $10 per month. That’s about the cost of two super-sized venti whatever lattes – that some of you buy in one day. OR
You could just pay the one year subscription for $60. That’s a 50% discount!
A as in AWESOME.
I have not been paid or compensated in any way to share my excitement about this killer social app.
The problem with even the best of breed social apps out there is that they don’t provide the kind of opportunity and efficiency as all those social media experts and fans tout. If a social app ONLY changes the life of one person for the better – one in ten million – that’s an epic fail. It’s not a win!
Because that win ain’t yours!
And that win never shall…
What is an acceptable rate of win?
An acceptable rate of win is a win for one in ten thousand. You won’t find an acceptable rate of win on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, Linkedin, etc. And if you can prove me wrong, Mazel tov! I’ll give you $100.
But before you reach for my Benjamin, I have to describe to you how I describe an acceptable rate of win.
Results are everything. And what can be done in one month is the best measure of any social app.
a. 1000+ Twitter friends auto-tweeting your posts
b. 100 new Twitter followers per week
c. Twitter verified your account because of your popularity
a. 1000+ Facebook friends and subscribers auto-sharing your wall posts
b. 100 new Facebook subscribers (personal or fanpage) per week
c. 1000 likes per week
a. 3% to 7% increase in blog traffic per week
b. 1,000 new subscribers per week
c. advertising revenues increase by .05% to 2% per month
Social Search is not just about typing a name, key word, or search phrase. It’s about the quality of results. It’s also about the speed of getting relevant results. More important than these, social search is really about the interaction available and the opportunity that can be unlocked between you and your social search result.
1. I can add up to 100 new people to my network per hour. I can search and find these new “Follows” in an intelligent and efficient manner.
a. Profile rankings based on the confidence by members of the community
b. Badges and Reputation earned by their selection for such by members of the community
c. Profession, Job Title, and Employer Company Name
d. Awards, Distinctions, and Recognitions
e. Personal Interests and Hobbies
f. Personal Likes (books, movies, music, etc.)
g. Full Name, email and/or location
h. Search Ranking of their profile and other online properties
i. Top 20 topics that reflect on them or their work (images may be included)
j. Mention in local, national or international news
2. Once identified, I can evaluate their relevance to me via a smart, useable summary of the above. That summary will also include information, pictures, art, other media and links which they have selected for the snap shot profile.
3. After adding people to my ADDS, several things will follow:
a. The Follow will be notified of my ADD by email or sms AND message in the network inbox of my account.
b. They will receive a snap shot profile of me and a call to action to consider adding me and/or send me a personal or form message that includes text, media and links.
c. If I do not send them one or two communications (maximum is two for a Follow) via the network within 30 days, I will be given the option to file “them” in a list of “Interesting People” or allow their name to drop from my list of Follows.
d. If they do not reply or respond to my initial ADD or messages within 60 days, their name will drop from my list of Follows regardless of my expectations and hopes. Furthermore, I will not be able to send them a message or re-ADD them for a period of six (6) months (or more) unless they initiate an ADD.
4. When they ADD me, they become a Friend.
a. I can send a Friend up to 20 free messages per month. The total size of a free message must be less than 1MB but it can include text, media and links. For an additional $5 per month, I can send up to 20 GBs of messages per month. Storage beyond 30 days is only a small, additional fee, but I can opt to have all my messages routed to my email before and after reading them.
b. I have fixed, named spaces and a rolling feed that can only be seen by Friends and/or the public according to the privacy settings I choose for a named space, my feed or an individual share. Regarding my Friends, I can also set privileges for what Friends can see what by “grouping” them. A Friend can be designated to as many groups as I create.
I could write ten pages about these killer features and I’d still have 12 more blog posts to write – telling you all about this BEAST.
Twitter, Facebook, whatever… ain’t no one that can touch this. Just like MC Hammer sings it!
MC Hammer, Can’t Touch This
Today, it’s good to be me.
And that’s what a killer social app does! It gives you every reason to shout this out from the rooftops:
IT’S GOOD TO BE ME!
I BELONG HERE!
HELLO YOU BEAUTIFUL WORLD AND PEOPLE! I LOVE YOU!
26 September 2012
3 Comments | Blogosphere and Internet, Business and Economics, Online Strategy (biz and politics), Social Web, Technology and Developers | Tagged: Killer Social App, social media DOHS, Social Proof, Social Search | Permalink
Posted by Stan Faryna
“Discovering that Twitter has unfollowed a lot of people for me, including some of my best friends. What the hell?”
– Mark Schaefer (@markwschaefer)
Twitter 3:02 PM – 11 May 12 via HootSuite
8 Comments | Blogosphere and Internet, Online Strategy (biz and politics), Social Web, Technology and Developers | Tagged: Brian Larson, Dong Wang, Twitter Engineering, Twitter Unfollow Bug | Permalink
Posted by Stan Faryna
Google’s new cloud-based online storage service, Google Drive, is yet another Faustian app by any other name. By uploading content to Google Drive, you grant Google a irrevocable license to use your stuff – even after you stop using Drive.
Robert Johnson, Crossroads
4 Comments | Blogosphere and Internet, Online Strategy (biz and politics), Technology and Developers | Tagged: Crossroads, dance with Devil, Dropbox, Faustian app, Google drive, Screwtape | Permalink
Posted by Stan Faryna
For those who know me by my blog here, my answer will surprise you. Because I’m not going to tell you that entrepreneurship is driven, foremost, by love, hope, and faith. Virtues, natural or supernatural, may fuel the mission and the vision, but love can not adequately describe the economic function of the entrepreneur. Nor shall leadership.
Great entrepreneurs are not born. They are made in hell.
10 Comments | Business and Economics, Leadership and Management, Technology and Developers | Tagged: economics, entrepreneur, entrepreneurship, heterogeneous resources, human action, judgment, preference, pricing, Profit, speculator, supply and demand | Permalink
Posted by Stan Faryna
Dr. Evil and Mini Me, Hard Knock Life
4 Comments | Business and Economics, Leadership and Management, Politics and Society, Technology and Developers | Tagged: Dave McClure, do good, do no evil, Dr. Evil, Kevin Rose, killing machines, Launch, San Francisco, Shimon Peres, Thomas Korte, Tony Hsieh, zappos | Permalink
Posted by Stan Faryna
You are currently browsing the archives for the Technology and Developers category.
|things to do today i… on The Faryna Podcast E2: Stan Fa…|
|places of visit in s… on Strategy for #Zombie Auth…|
|singapore top ten at… on The Final Speech of the Great…|
|singapore current ev… on Nisha Varghese #50NewFeet|
|https://www.facebook… on SOPA, Fukushima, and the Roman…|
Follow me on Twitter: @Faryna